“The judge added that the mother may have the children jabbed without their father’s consent.”
Republication by: Lawrence Morra III
Zero Lift-Off Only The Beginning
For sharing and informational purposes on this platform only.
February 8, 2022
TIME TO GET REAL
“Furthermore, mRNA technology pioneer Dr. Robert Malone warned parents against allowing their children to be injected with the experimental jabs during a January 23 address at the “Defeat the Mandates” rally in Washington, D.C.
The distinguished scientist noted that the “genetic vaccines can damage your children. They may damage their brains, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future. Many of these damages cannot be repaired. So I beg you, please get informed about the possible risks that your children may be damaged by these experimental medical products.”
I’m stating unequivocally that I’m on the same side of history and the Great Judgment to come as this fine scientist Dr. Malone, who said enough of the lies, to the Big Pharma/MSM propagandists of the world who are murdering and committing global genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, as they serve the Beast System owned and operated by Satan.
“Justice Nathalie Godbout of the Court of Queen’s Bench, New Brunswick, issued a ruling January 31 to the father of three, forbidding him from seeing his children in person over his refusal to receive one of the abortion-tainted COVID-19 inoculations.
Godbout restricted the father’s visitation rights after noting that his second child – a 10-year-old girl – has a compromised immune system, which the judge deemed to be at risk from any physical contact between the girl and her “unvaccinated” father and his new partner.”
Interesting name this Godbout has when I read this I saw God-b-Out and regardless of whether this is pure coincidence or not, I know God’s truth far better than this witch working for Big Phama/Pharmakeia, the term pharmakeia which is an abstract noun meaning sorcery, magic, the practice of magic arts; and the Beast System she serves!
“The Greek word pharmakeia is used in Galatians 5:19.
However, if you were told that this word means “the use of or the
administrating of drugs” then you were misinformed. The word is a fairly
general one. My Greek dictionary defines it as: “witchcraft, magic, the
use of spells and potions of magic, often involving drugs–a magic
spell. It is a fact that witchcraft and magic in the Greek world often
involved the use of drugs–either by the witch or the one on whom the
magic is worked. I have heard the same thing taught that you quote. It
is not absolutely false, but it is not good use of the Greek. Probably,
whoever gave you this bogus definition also told you that we get the word
pharmacy from this Greek root word. That, of course, is true, but this
does not mean that the meaning of the word has not changed! Put it this
way, if one were to use and administer drugs for the sole purpose of
creating a mind-altered state, then one could probably be judged to have
violated the commandment not to be involved in pharmakiea. Probably
whoever told you this got the definition second hand and did not bother to
look up the Greek. I see this as an attempt to make the stricture in
Galatians 5:19 practical for a modern, particularly an American crowd.
This is a good thing to do, but in making the scripture practical,
we should always begin with good exegesis. If you lived in parts of
Africa, the definition given above would apply in all its meanings. I
have visited churches in third world countries where the sin of magic
spells and relying on witch doctors is very much prevalent; even among
Christians.”
“On Bible translations, I use a few different translations. There are some
translations which I do not recommend (New World Translation–very biased
by the JW’s, KJ Version–to archaic and based on relatively poor Greek
manuscripts, The Living Bible, a too-loose and somewhat biased
paraphrase). There are almost too many good translations to recommend.
My suggestion is that if you want to do careful, deep and thorough study,
you use three or four translations. I use the Jerusalem Bible, the NIV,
the Holman Christian Standard and the Revised Standard. I also suggest
you avoid the mistake made by the one who taught you somewhat inaccurately
from Galatians 5:19 by getting a Greek Dictionary. Best is to get a copy
of the Zondervan Exhaustive Concordance.”
John Oakes, PhD evidenceforchristianity.org
To Justice Godbout; who has put God OUT of her earthly judgments just as pussy justy-trustee-boy Trudeau, the elitist globalist puppet for Satan has too, along with all those in the corrupted “Ways of the World Beast System” are doing; I have one thing to say to you as you serve Satan, you will spend eternity in Hell!
Pharmakeia in Revelation
“Pharmakeia” occurs two times in the Book of Revelation.
1) Revelation 9:20-21
6th Trumpet & 2nd Woe
20 The rest of mankind, who were not killed by these plagues, did not repent of the works of their hands nor give up worshiping demons and idols of gold and silver and bronze and stone and wood, which cannot see or hear or walk, 21 nor did they repent of their murders or their sorceries (pharmakeia) or their sexual immorality or their thefts.
2) Revelation 18:23-24
23 … for your merchants were the great ones of the earth, and all nations were deceived by your sorcery (pharmakeia). 24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints, and of all who have been slain on earth.”
The time has come and the Goats are being separated from the Sheep like no other time in earthly history because the final stage is being set for the Final Battle! Many on this internet and throughout civilization are playing with the Beast and are mesmerized thinking they see Truth when they live lies!
“Put up or shut up” is a very well known colloquial term; but I say to all Wake Up or Burn in Hell! The Alarm Bell is Ringing and you’re not listening!
God bless!
Brother in Christ Jesus,
Lawrence Morra III
New Brunswick father loses custody of children after refusing COVID vaccine
David McLoone
Mon Feb 7, 2022 – 2:38 pm EST
FREDERICTON, New Brunswick (LifeSiteNews) – Another Canadian father has been separated from his children after a judge ruled that he posed a health threat to one of them because he refuses to take the COVID-19 jabs.
Justice Nathalie Godbout of the Court of Queen’s Bench, New Brunswick, issued a ruling January 31 to the father of three, forbidding him from seeing his children in person over his refusal to receive one of the abortion-tainted COVID-19 inoculations.
Godbout restricted the father’s visitation rights after noting that his second child – a 10-year-old girl – has a compromised immune system, which the judge deemed to be at risk from any physical contact between the girl and her “unvaccinated” father and his new partner.
The court documents do not identify the parents by name.
“As the parents who are caring for [the child] 50 per cent of the time, in close quarters, unmasked and unvaccinated, they are well-positioned to transmit the virus to [the child] should they contract it, this despite their best efforts,” a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) report of Godbout’s ruling reads.
The judge concluded that the children “must be given their best possible chance at evading infection from COVID-19,” deeming the father’s “vaccine” status to be unsatisfactory for this requirement and, “with a heavy heart,” temporarily removing his custody rights.
The parents separated in 2019, according to the CBC, establishing at the time shared custody of their three children.
When the children became eligible to receive the COVID shots, the father refused to sign his consent to their being jabbed, reportedly after researching the effects of the shots and determining that they were unsafe for his children.
Current data suggest that children face extremely low risk from COVID-19. This, combined with the thousands of reports of serious adverse events including deaths following the jabs, has led numerous experts to criticize the push to inject children with the experimental shots.
Last summer, researchers with Johns Hopkins School of Medicine found a “mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition such as leukemia” when they “analyze[d] approximately 48,000 children under 18 diagnosed with COVID in health-insurance data from April to August 2020.”
In response to the finding, lead researcher Dr. Marty Makary accused the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) of basing its advocacy of school COVID vaccination on “flimsy data.”
Furthermore, mRNA technology pioneer Dr. Robert Malone warned parents against allowing their children to be injected with the experimental jabs during a January 23 address at the “Defeat the Mandates” rally in Washington, D.C.
The distinguished scientist noted that the “genetic vaccines can damage your children. They may damage their brains, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future. Many of these damages cannot be repaired. So I beg you, please get informed about the possible risks that your children may be damaged by these experimental medical products.”
Indeed, coronavirus shot trials have never produced evidence that the jabs stop infection or transmission. They do not even claim to reduce hospitalization, but the measurement of success is in preventing severe symptoms of COVID-19 disease. Moreover, there is strong evidence that the “vaccinated” are just as likely to carry and transmit the virus as the unvaccinated.
Despite myriad evidence of the needlessness of inoculating children against the virus, the judge gave the mother permission to have the children jabbed without paternal consent, saying “[the father’s] own anecdotal research on such a highly specialized topic carries little to no weight in the overall analysis when measured against the sound medical advice of our public health officials.”
Grant Ogilvie, a lawyer representing the mother, said that she was “ecstatic” about the decision and confirmed that the children have now received their first dose of the shots.
“She’s acknowledged this is going to have an impact on the children, but she said, ‘I have to do what’s best for them,’” Ogilvie stated.
The father was granted permission to see and speak with his children only over the phone and through video calling, which Godbout described as “generous.” She added that the father may have his suspension overturned if he agrees to accept the jab.
Godbout’s decision follows a remarkably similar ruling in Quebec handed down just before Christmas, in which a father had his visitation rights temporarily suspended after the mother told a judge he is “anti-vaccine” and posts “conspiracy” theories on social media.
Judge Jean-Sébastien Vaillancourt of the Superior Court for the District of Montreal ruled December 23 to “temporarily” bar a Quebec father from visiting his three young children over his “vaccine” status and for publishing social media posts in opposition to the province’s restrictive COVID measures.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. LM
LikeLike