BONKERS; It’s a Foregone Conclusion

“crime syndicate”

Kamala Harris And AOC Craft Crazy Climate Law

Reblog Republishing by   Zero Lift-Off  Only The Beginning

(For nonprofit informational sharing purposes only)

BONKERS; It’s a Foregone Conclusion

by Lawrence Morra

kamala slave hands docu

After many years of the government of the people being run like a “crime syndicate” with all of the nefarious agendas running rampant so that our elected officials practically lined their pockets with Gold not just lots of hidden money, laundered cash from other countries by means of all of their backdoor deal payoffs or getting their palms greased by Big Pharma and many other highly exploitative corporations or powerful private entities; by doing right for all the many lobbyists, while pissing away “We the Peoples” future and our “beloved America” to a point where they even got in bed with our worst enemy the Chinese Communist Party to allow them to slowly and methodically squeeze the heart and soul out of America with their propaganda machine lined up with our own Political/MSM Machine.  This to create the perfect storm or conditions to take away our Constitution bit by bit while metering in more communism in the name of diversity, socialism and political correctness to the point where we now have these basically “diabolical whack jobs” in our government playing us all for fools, while they attack or dismantle much of our heritage and tradition; where even now they sponsor and sanctify BLM or ANTIFA Mobs, Insane Fight Clubs if you will, against We the People! Doing this while stomping on “religious freedom of Christians” which is a “foundational cornerstone of our nation under God;” all to be replaced with this kind of garbage legislation that is useless pandemonium dribble meant to further create confusion and disintegration of the very fabric of our “Constitutional Republic” with division as one of the tools to collapse our government, “divide and conquer!”  This being implemented with these whack-a-mole types which eventually are like repeatedly getting rid of something, only to have more of that thing appear, with their spewing gibberish, chaotic and basically insane ideas coming from these worst of the worst human beings, that have no heart nor soul; because they sign them over to Satan. Their “soul mission” is “destruction and accomplishing self-serving gains of wealth and power” at everybody else’s expense; other than the “elitists whom they work for.”

EfZaOevX0AAM4cm

I’ll say it like it is, if “we the people don’t vote out of office as many Dems as possible and make certain “Trump is reelected” in this upcoming election we can basically count on kissing our way of life and our asses’ goodbye!” Please keep praying for us all and seeking the truth; while sharing it with all who will listen. God bless.

Brother in Christ Jesus,

Lawrence Morra

https://lawrencemorra.com/2020/08/05/aoc-is-demonically-influenced/

https://lawrencemorra.com/2020/08/13/the-total-fraud-candidate-kamala/

https://lawrencemorra.com/2020/05/12/the-destruction-of-america-with-impunity/#

https://lawrencemorra.com/2019/11/17/until-you-fall-like-overripe-fruit-into-our-hands/

 

By David Wojick, Ph.D. ~

Kamala Harris did not mention climate change in her acceptance speech, but she did not have to. She talked a lot about justice and justice is now code for climate. Thanks to Harris and AOC, the strange beast of “climate justice” is now a big part of the Democrat’s agenda.

In fact the team of Harris and AOC has now codified the concept of climate justice. Just before the convention they jointly dropped the Climate Equity Act into the Senate and House hoppers.

The Equity Act does not mean that everyone gets their fair share of climate. The stated goal is for the Federal Government to adjust its investments and regulations to favor those who are supposedly most involved with climate change, or something like that.

The proposed law is so incoherent that it is hard to tell what it is for or what it does. That it would cause an enormous amount of confusion is certain.

The problem is that the central concept in the law is extremely unclear. Harris and AOC have continued the “war on climate” theme that AOC used when proposing the Green New Deal. Thus the Climate Equity Act is about something called “frontline communities.”

Apparently these so-called communities are on the frontline of climate change, or the frontline of stopping climate change, or some such. It is very hard to tell.

Here is how the Kamala Harris press release puts it:

COVID-19 has laid bare the realities of systemic racial, health, economic, and environmental injustices that persist in our country,” said Sen. Harris. “The environment we live in cannot be disentangled from the rest of our lives, and it is more important than ever that we work toward a more just and equitable future. That is why, as we combat the climate crisis and build a clean economy; we must put justice and equity first. I’m proud to partner with Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez on this comprehensive proposal to empower communities that have been neglected by policymakers for far too long.

The Climate Equity Act creates an administrative structure within the federal government to ensure that as we boldly address the climate crisis, our policies are founded in equity and justice for frontline communities. By ensuring that frontline community leaders and allies are playing a fundamental role in shaping and guiding federal policy, the Climate Equity Act helps hold the government accountable for creating a more just and equitable future as we tackle the climate crisis and build a clean economy.

‘Frontline communities’ are those that have experienced systemic socioeconomic disparities, environmental racism, and other forms of injustice, including low-income communities, indigenous peoples, and communities of color. As the climate crisis continues, these communities and others, including deindustrialized communities, depopulated rural communities, vulnerable elderly populations, unhoused populations, and people with disabilities and the women, youth, and future generations belonging to these communities — will be impacted first and hardest by the climate crisis.

The Climate Equity Act holds the government accountable to frontline communities when it considers a policy, regulation, or investment with a climate or environmental nexus which could broadly include direct policies to address the environment and climate change, but also transportation, housing, infrastructure, jobs, workforce development, and more.”

So everything depends on what a frontline community is. It is here that the confusion begins. This central concept, upon which everything turns, is deliberately not defined. That definition is something to be done after the law is passed, by an Advisory Board no less. I am not making this up.

There is however, this wildly over the top guidance in the draft law:

SEC. 205. DEFINITION OF FRONTLINE COMMUNITY.
(a) IN GENERAL. The Board of Advisors shall establish a definition of ‘‘frontline community’’ for purposes of this Act.
(b) INCLUSIONS. The definition under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum
(1) a community or population that has experienced systemic socioeconomic disparities, environmental injustice, or another form of injustice, including
(A) a low-income community;
(B) an indigenous community; and (C) a community of color;
(2) a community or population that is the most vulnerable and will be the most adversely impacted by environmental and climate injustice and inequitable climate actions, including
(A) a community or population described in paragraph (1);
(B) a deindustrialized community; (C) a depopulated rural community; (D) a vulnerable elderly population; (E) an unhoused population;
(F) individuals with disabilities; and
(G) a community that is economically dependent on fossil fuel industries; and
(3) the women, the youth, and all of the descendants of women or youth that are part of a community or population described in paragraph (1) or (2) above
.”

Note that section (2)(F) says that individuals with disabilities are by themselves frontline communities. One person communities? And the Advisory Board cannot change this inclusion. In fact all they can do is expand the definition to include more people.

I have no idea what section (3) means. It sounds as though if you are a descendent of a woman (but not a man?) in a frontline community you are still in it, or something. Or maybe only the women and youths in a frontline community are actually in it, not the older men? This section is truly incoherent.

Note too that in addition to communities there are also populations. What the difference is I have no idea. Perhaps communities have to be geographically together while populations do not, such as all the elderly people in New Mexico.

There is no way to tell from this incredibly vague and incoherent definition where the frontline communities are or who is in them.

The law requires that every proposed federal regulation, policy and investment (all grants, loans, etc.) that affects any frontline community must be analyzed for its impact. The negative impact must be minimized and the positive impact maximized. In the case of investments the agency is required to favor frontline communities to the extent allowed by law. Whether this includes federal contracts is unclear.

Given that there is no way to tell what a frontline community is, the result can only be chaos. Agencies cannot analyze what they cannot identify. If they try, in big money cases the attempt is certain to wind up in Federal Court, which the proposed law specifically allows for.

This law is modeled after the infamous National Environmental Policy Act, which requires environmental impact analysis of all federal, federally financed, or approved, projects. But in this case it is the economic impact on something undefined that must be analyzed and optimized.

This is the worst proposed law I have ever see. It is both wildly overreaching and deeply incoherent. But then the concept of climate justice is itself incoherent.

That Kamala Harris and AOC have teamed up to produce this complete nonsense is an ominous sign of things to come if the Democrats prevail in November.

David Wojick contributes Posts at the CFACT site. He is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy.

Author: Lawrence Morra

Have worked in creative and news visual media as a photographer or cameraman and this POV has given me a better insight or view of the world. The Cameraman's POV. His Perspective on many things. All content on this site is copyrighted© by Lawrence Morra/Zero Lift-Off. All rights reserved. Email: lmor3@aol.com

2 thoughts on “BONKERS; It’s a Foregone Conclusion”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: